TAN KIM HOR & ORS v. TAN HENG CHEW & ORS [2003] 1 CLJ 634

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the respondents – Lim Kian Leong (Low Chi Cheng, Neela Iadurey); M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

Court Of Appeal

COMPANY LAW: Winding up – Just and equitable rule – Application to strike out petition – Company comprising family members – Proper approach – Whether to give due considerations to personal character of relationship between parties – Whether to avoid trial by affidavits – Striking out petition by way of O. 18 r. 19 Rules of the High Court 1980 – Whether undesirable – Companies Act 1965, s. 218(1)(i) – Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 18 r. 19 (1)(a), (b) & (d)

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out – Winding up petition – Striking out petition under O. 18 r. 19 Rules of the High Court 1980 – Whether undesirable – Whether to be resorted to in plain and obvious cases – Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 18 r. 19(1)(a), (b) & (d) – Companies Act 1965, s. 218(1)(i)

DYTM TENGKU IDRIS SHAH IBNI SULTAN SALAHUDDIN ABDUL AZIZ SHAH v. DIKIM HOLDINGS SDN BHD & ANOR [2002] 3 CLJ 69

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the appellant – Low Chi Cheng (Wong Yoke Peng); M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

Federal Court

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: Suit involving Regent of State – Jurisdiction – Whether plaintiff’s suit against defendants should proceed in Special Court and not High Court upon plaintiff’s appointment as Regent of Selangor – Interpretation of "Ruler" – Whether a Regent is a "Ruler" under arts. 160, 181, 182 and 183 of the Federal Constitution – Dato’ Menteri Othman Baginda & Anor v. Dato’ Ombi Syed Alwi Syed Idrus

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION: Construction of statutes – Interpretation of "Ruler" – Whether a Regent is a "Ruler" under arts. 160, 181, 182 and 183 of Federal Constitution – Dato’ Menteri Othman Baginda & Anor v. Dato’ Ombi Syed Alwi Syed Idrus

YAP MOI v. HONG LEONG BANK BHD [2002] 3 CLJ 562

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the respondent – Lim Kian Leong (Chan Kah Meng); M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

Court Of Appeal

BANKING: Banks and banking business – Collection of ‘Account payee only’ cheques – Cheques banked in favour of third party – No authorisation by named payee – Respondent bank disregarding endorsement "account payee only", "not negotiable" and cancellation of "or bearer/atau pembawa" in cheques – Whether respondent bank acted recklessly – Peculiar contrary banking practice – Whether an accepted defence

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS: Cheque – ‘Account payee only’ – Cheques banked in favour of third party – No authorisation by named payee – Whether respondent bank could seek protection under s. 85, Bills of Exchange Act 1949

LEOW TEOW BENG v. LIEW CHUN WAH & ORS; LIEW CHEE SENG (INTERVENOR) [2000] 5 CLJ 318

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the intervenor – KM Chan; M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

High Court

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Affidavits – Exhibit – Exhibit annexed to affidavit-insupport of application – Whether opposing party could use exhibit to contest application – Whether opposing party must file an affidavit in reply annexing exhibit thereto – Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 32 r. 13(2)(b)

YAP MOI v. HONG LEONG BANK BHD [1999] 7 CLJ 603

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the defendant – Lim Kian Leong; M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

High Court

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Summary judgment – Appeal – Plaintiff’s claim for conversion of cheques – Whether there were triable issues – Whether affidavit in support of summary judgment defective – Whether summary judgment should have been granted

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Affidavits – Defective affidavit in application for summary judgment – Failure of plaintiff to apply for leave of court – Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 14 rr. 4 and 7(1) – Whether affidavit could be used to support application for summary judgment