Category: Current Law Journal

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
Cik Neela Iaduray for appellant/plaintiff (Messrs Lim Kian Leong & Co)

High Court

Issue was appeal against a striking out of a statement of claim.

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the plaintiff – Lim Kian Leong (Low Chi Cheng); M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

Federal Court

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW : Suit involving ruler – Jurisdiction – Suit filed in High Court before plaintiff became ruler – Whether High Court continued to have jurisdiction to adjudicate suit after plaintiff became ruler – Whether Special Court had the exclusive jurisdiction – Whether High Court had power to transfer suit to Special Court – Whether suit should be withdrawn and refiled in Special Court – Federal Constitution, arts. 38(4), 70(1), 121, 181, 182, 183

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the respondents – Lim Kian Leong (Low Chi Cheng, Neela Iadurey); M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

Court Of Appeal

COMPANY LAW: Winding up – Just and equitable rule – Application to strike out petition – Company comprising family members – Proper approach – Whether to give due considerations to personal character of relationship between parties – Whether to avoid trial by affidavits – Striking out petition by way of O. 18 r. 19 Rules of the High Court 1980 – Whether undesirable – Companies Act 1965, s. 218(1)(i) – Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 18 r. 19 (1)(a), (b) & (d)

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Striking out – Winding up petition – Striking out petition under O. 18 r. 19 Rules of the High Court 1980 – Whether undesirable – Whether to be resorted to in plain and obvious cases – Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 18 r. 19(1)(a), (b) & (d) – Companies Act 1965, s. 218(1)(i)

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the appellant – Low Chi Cheng (Wong Yoke Peng); M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

Federal Court

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: Suit involving Regent of State – Jurisdiction – Whether plaintiff’s suit against defendants should proceed in Special Court and not High Court upon plaintiff’s appointment as Regent of Selangor – Interpretation of "Ruler" – Whether a Regent is a "Ruler" under arts. 160, 181, 182 and 183 of the Federal Constitution – Dato’ Menteri Othman Baginda & Anor v. Dato’ Ombi Syed Alwi Syed Idrus

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION: Construction of statutes – Interpretation of "Ruler" – Whether a Regent is a "Ruler" under arts. 160, 181, 182 and 183 of Federal Constitution – Dato’ Menteri Othman Baginda & Anor v. Dato’ Ombi Syed Alwi Syed Idrus

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the respondent – Lim Kian Leong (Chan Kah Meng); M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

Court Of Appeal

BANKING: Banks and banking business – Collection of ‘Account payee only’ cheques – Cheques banked in favour of third party – No authorisation by named payee – Respondent bank disregarding endorsement "account payee only", "not negotiable" and cancellation of "or bearer/atau pembawa" in cheques – Whether respondent bank acted recklessly – Peculiar contrary banking practice – Whether an accepted defence

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS: Cheque – ‘Account payee only’ – Cheques banked in favour of third party – No authorisation by named payee – Whether respondent bank could seek protection under s. 85, Bills of Exchange Act 1949

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
Peguam bagi pihak Defendan 8: Encik Lim Kian Leong dari Tetuan Lim Kian Leong & Co

High Court

Issue is on injunction.

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
Peguamcara bagi pihak Defendan: Tetuan Lim Kian Leong & Co

High Court

Issue is on Private caveat

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the Plaintiff – CC Low; M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

High Court

CIVIL PROCEDURE : Cost – Application to review assessment of Senior Assistant Registrar – Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 59 r. 36(2) – Application made before Registrar’s Certificate was issued – Whether application was made prematurely – Whether application to file should be allowed

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
Cik CC Low (Cik Neela Iaduray with her) for the Plaintiff (M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co)

High Court

Issue is whether or not the Defendant did make any representations to the Plaintiff to induce the entry into the SPA and if so, the nature of those misrepresentations and secondly whether any agreement was reached in the terms of the Second Supplemental Agreement.

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the intervenor – KM Chan; M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

High Court

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Affidavits – Exhibit – Exhibit annexed to affidavit-insupport of application – Whether opposing party could use exhibit to contest application – Whether opposing party must file an affidavit in reply annexing exhibit thereto – Rules of the High Court 1980, O. 32 r. 13(2)(b)