Author: editor

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the respondent – Chai Jia Hui; M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

INDUSTRIAL COURT

section 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1967- dismissal of employee by the employer(respondent)- Claimant informed the Court that he has decided to withdraw the case with no liberty to reinstate the case

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the plaintiff – Lim Kian Leong; M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR

Application to strike out under O. 18 r. 19(1)(a), or (b) or (d) of the Rules of the High Court 1980 or the inherent jurisdiction of the court.

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the Intervener – K T Tan (Vincent Tan with him); M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

HIGH COURT

Evidence-Land Reference proceedings-raising the issue of ‘admin error’ in the Forms G & H as per the Schedule Land Acquisition Act (‘LAA’) -is the intervenor allowed to raise the objection after 7 years

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the 1st defendant – Chan Kah Meng (Veronica Elenia Ong with her); M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

HIGH COURT

Plaintiff’s application to strike out the 1st Defendant’s Counterclaim pursuant to Order 18 rule 19 of the Rules of the High Court 1980.

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
Bagi pihak defendan pertama, defendan ketiga & defendan keempat – Lim Kian Leong (KY Cheah bersamanya); T/n Lim Kian Leong & Co

MAHKAMAH TINGGI

PROSEDUR SIVIL: Afidavit – Pengikraran – Afidavit sokongan – Permohonan membatalkan tuntutan balas disokong oleh afidavit yang diikrarkan oleh peguam – Sama ada peguam yang mewakili anakguam tidak boleh ikrarkan afidavit bagi anakguamnya – Sama ada satu ketidakaturan – Sama ada afidavit sokongan boleh diterima – Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Tinggi 1980, A. 41 k. 6

PROSEDUR SIVIL: Pliding – Pemfailan – Kelewatan memfailkan pliding – Sama ada kelewatan yang melampau tanpa apa-apa penjelasan – Sama ada memprejudiskan plaintif-plaintif – Sama ada satu penyalahgunaan proses mahkamah

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
Bagi pihak responden – Lim Kian Leong (Cheah Kit Yee bersamanya) ; T/n Lim Kian Leong & Co

MAHKAMAH RAYUAN

Taksiran cukai -adakah Responden gagal untuk membayar cukai yang ditaksirkan dalam tempoh yang ditetapkan tanpa mengira sama ada terdapat atau tidak rayuan terhadap taksiran itu-subseksyen 103(1) Akta Cukai Pendapatan 1967-Pesuruhjaya Khas Cukai Pendapatan membuat dapatan fakta dan membuat Perintah Pemutus yang menyatakan bahawa hasil jualan tanah di Langkawi itu bukan pendapatan yang tertakluk pada Akta Cukai Pendapatan 1967 tetapi pada Akta Cukai Keuntungan Harta Tanah 1976, asas bagi pengeluaran Notis Taksiran bertarikh 27/12/2004 itu gagal dan tidak lagi wujud.-Mahkamah Rayuan bersetuju dengan keputusan ini -menolak rayuan Perayu dengan kos. Perayu telah diperintahkan membayar kos sebanyak RM10 ribu kepada Responden.

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the 1st respondent – Lim Kian Leong (Paul Ngooi with him); M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

HIGH COURT

COMPANIES AND CORPORATIONS: Schemes of arrangement – Unsecured creditors – Whether better for court to wind up debtor than approve schemes of arrangement – Whether question one of commercial sensibility which scheme creditors were better positioned than court to decide – Whether schemes fair equitable and bona fide

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the respondent – Veronica Ong; M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

Industrial Court

Wrongful termination – Claimant a Clerk of Works located in Saudi Arabia – case settled between parties in the sum of RM100,000

COUNSEL & SOLICITOR:
For the 1st, 3rd & 4th defendant (originating motion), plaintiffs (tuntutan balas); M/s Lim Kian Leong & Co

High Court

Civil procedure – Striking out – Order 18 rule 19 (1) (a),(c),(d) Rules of the High Court 1980 – dismissed

Preliminary objection allowed-delay and personal knowledge